Saturday 24 December 2011

The Blind Assassin by Margaret Atwood

Apologies for the month long absence from this blog, life has been super busy heading up to Christmas but I hope to be a regular poster in the New Year. I thought I would leave you with one final review of the year on The Blind Assassin by Margaret Atwood.

Plot:  "Ten days after the war ended, my sister Laura drove a car off a bridge."

More than fifty years on, Iris Chase is remembering Laura's mysterious death. And so begins and extraordinary and compelling story of two sisters and their secrets. Set against a panoramic backdrop of twentieth-century history, The Blind Assassin is an epic tale of memory, intrigue and betrayal.








The Blind Assassin was the winner of the 2000 Booker Prize and represented the first win for Margaret Atwood having been previously nominated three times before for The Handmaid's Tale in 1986, Cat's Eye in 1989 and Alias Grace in 1996. I had never read any of her novels before and have to say that it was the cover that initially attracted me to the book and then the intriguing plot summary.

The Blind Assassin is made up of three different parts which consistently intertwine. At the beginning of the novel we are introduced to Iris Chase in the modern day who is writing her memoires for the benefit of her estranged grand daughter and who is our main guide on the journey through the life of the Chase sisters.
The 2nd part, made up of newspaper articles scattered throughout the book, provide us with background information on the life of this family and the important historical events in Canada at the time. The third part is a novel within the novel. 'The Blind Assassin' is not just the title of the book, but also the title of the novel Laura Chase wrote before her death and which has been published posthumously. In this book we are introduced to two characters carrying out a clandestine love affair and during their meetings, the male character narrates science fiction stories about children forced to make carpets until they lose their sight, who are then recruited as assassins. Hence the title 'The Blind Assassin.'

If this all sounds a bit complicated then to be honest at first it is. However, once you get used to the way the novel jumps around and begin to learn more about the background to Laura's novel, then everything starts to fit into place and I found this book really difficult to put down.

Iris' story of how she is married off to a cold, heartless business tycoon in order to save her family from ruin demonstrates how women were too often treated as material goods passed from father to husband in the early 20th century. The way she is treated by her in-laws and her declining relationship with her sister are heartbreaking, but there is also a considerable element of humour within the book, particularly in Iris' descriptions of daily life as an old woman.

There are a number of twists and turns in the book and some were easier to see coming than others, but overall the final twist took me by surprise and I plan on reading the book again in the future to see if my opinions of the characters are changed by this revelation. Some of the other reviews of this book that I have read have complained that the characters were too distant and difficult to feel any sympathy for. I disagree with this. Although Laura Chase comes across as a complex character who we never really understand completely, our narrator Iris Chase is incredibly sympathetic and she ends the novel by acknowledging the mistakes she has made, without seeking forgiveness.

Just as each character in the book interprets Laura's novel in different ways in order to fit with their idea of the truth behind her death, each reader of Margaret Atwood's book is likely to have their own view as to whether or not Laura is a victim of circumstance or the instigator of her own sad fate.

Overall I think this book is definitely worth a read, especially for book groups because there are so many opportunities for different interpretations of the story.

I would love to know how many of you have read this book and whether you liked it. Also have you read any of Margaret Atwood's other novels? Could you recommend which one I should tackle next?

Saturday 26 November 2011

My Week with Marilyn- Review

Year: 2011

Writers: Adrian Hodges (screenplay), Colin Clark (book)

Director: Simon Curtis

Starring: Michelle Williams, Eddie Redmayne, Kenneth Branagh, Emma Watson, Julia Ormond, Judi Dench, Toby Jones and Dominic Cooper.

Plot: Colin Clark, an employee of Sir Laurence Olivier's witnesses the tense production of the Prince and the Showgirl and falls into an unlikely relationship with the fragile Marilyn Monroe.




So I have just got back from seeing this movie with a good friend and thought I would get the review down on the blog for those of you looking for weekend movie viewing inspiration. My Week with Marilyn is based on 'The Prince, the Showgirl and Me, and 'My Week With Marilyn,' two memoirs by Colin Clark which detailed his time spent as Third Assistant Director on The Prince and the Showgirl filmed in England in 1957.

The Prince and the Showgirl was a troubled production from the start. Laurence Olivier, a classically trained Shakespearean actor grew frustrated with Marilyn Monroe's obsession with Method acting and her need to have her acting mentor Paula Strasberg accompany her everywhere she went on set. For Laurence Olivier acting was just that, acting, but Paula Strasberg had instilled in Marilyn the idea that she had to find and understand the character completely and not do something in a scene if she didn't feel that it was true to the character. Fragile Marilyn was struggling with a third possible failed marriage to Arthur Miller and her entourage was keen to keep her doped up on pills to make her easier to control.

My Week with Marilyn has been considerably hyped due to the performance by the lead actress Michelle Williams and I would say that overall this hype is thoroughly deserved. Michelle Williams performance is utterly convincing. She manages to successfully convey the sensuality and movie star charisma of the public Marilyn while at the same time tapping into the vulnerability and instability of the woman behind the spotlight. There are times in the movie when Marilyn hints at her fractured childhood and her desperate need for children and Michelle Williams plays this with such subtlety and pathos, that at times it was very sad to watch knowing what we now do about her tragic death. The only time I felt she failed to achieve Marilyn's magnetism was when she was recreating the scenes from the movie. She didn't have the same sparkle as the original.

Kenneth Branagh was for me a slight week point in the production. He has publically stated how much he admires Olivier and I often felt like his performance, although excellent, was a little bit too much of direct impersonation and slightly hammy. Eddie Redmayne was the heart of the story as the naive Colin Clark and his relationship with Marilyn felt believable. The rest of the cast should also be commended, especially Judi Dench who plays Dame Sybil Thorndike, the ageing actress who tries her best to make Marilyn feel comfortable on the increasingly tense set and Zoe Wanamaker as Paula Strasberg. Julia Ormond as Vivien Leigh barely has anything of consequence to do and she failed to make any impression in a role which could have made more of the obvious jealousy that Vivien would have felt towards Marilyn.

This film is incredibly enjoyable and manages to mix humour and pathos in equal measure. At 99 minutes it is an easy watch and plays more like a good old fashioned English comedy drama then a heavyweight movie biopic! It appears to be the director Simon Curtis' first film, having previously focused on directing BBC period dramas such as Cranford and David Copperfield.

I would definitely recommend this and look forward to hearing what everyone else thinks about it. Check out the trailer below and a clip from one of my favourite scenes.

Trivia: For Downton Abbey fans, this movie has two links to the period drama. Not only does Carson the Butler have a small role as a pub landlord, but the director Simon Curtis is married to Elizabeth Mcgovern  who plays Cora the Countess of Grantham!



Monday 21 November 2011

The Weird Sisters by Eleanor Brown

I have just got back from my monthly book group where our book of choice to discuss was The Weird Sisters by Eleanor Brown. So I thought I would get my book review done on the blog while still fresh and also add some views that came out of the book group tonight.




Plot:  Unlucky in work, love and life, the Andreas sisters return to their childhood home, ostensibly to care for their ailing mother. But each sister has a secret she's unwilling to share – each has come home to lick her own wounds. 


The Andreas family is an eccentric one. Books are their passion (a trip to the library usually solved everything), TV is something other families watched. Their father – a renowned, eccentric professor of Shakespeare who communicates almost exclusively in Shakespearean verse – named all three girls for great Shakespearean women – Rose (Rosalind), Bean (Bianca), and Cordy (Cordelia); as a result, the girls find that they have a lot to live up to.

With this burden, as well as others they shoulder, the Andreas sisters have a difficult time communicating with both their parents and their lovers, but especially with each other. Each sister has found her life nothing like she had thought it would be – and suddenly faced with their parents' frailty and their own disappointments and setbacks, their usual quick salve of a book suddenly can't solve what ails them. Can all three escape their archetypal roots and find happiness in a normal life? As it turns out, the small town of Barnwell and their sisterly bond offer much more than they ever expected.


I knew that myself and 'The Weird Sisters' were going to get along just fine when I opened the book to the first page and found myself confronted with a quote from my favourite Shakespeare play of all time. 'I dreamt last night of the three weird sisters.'


Shakespeare plays a principal role throughout the book as his words are used by each of the members of the Andreas family to convey their feelings during times of personal stress. Books and Shakespeare are the loves of the Andreas family and I found myself falling in love with them too as the story went on.


Being an only child I found the relationship between the three sisters endlessly fascinating, the way they could one minute be saying the cruellest things to each other and in a heartbeat be offering words of comfort like nothing had happened. Eleanor Brown manages to write each sister with such depth that you begin to know their character differences intimately and how they will react to any given situation. You become invested in their struggle to shake off the trappings of their Shakespearean namesakes and find themselves and the life they truly desire.


The use of Shakespearean quotes is inspired and Eleanor Brown should be applauded on the amount of research she must have done into Shakespeare's works in order to fill the book with such a high quantity of quotes which all seem to add something to the story and provide us with more insight into the characters' emotions. 


 I also loved the descriptions of their home town of Barnwell which painted such a vivid portrait in my mind of a small university town with the quaint library, student frequented coffee shop and homely church. I could have stepped inside the book and made myself right at home.


The scenes describing their mother's illness and her treatments are heartbreaking and difficult to read at times, but incredibly truthful. You find yourself willing this woman to get better as the book goes on and you see glimpses of her character but she is not as well rounded as the other characters in the story.


Within our book group I was the most enamoured with this book. I thoroughly enjoyed reading it and was sad to leave these characters behind when it came to the end. The one thing I didn't enjoy so much was the narrative voice, meant to be the three sisters narrating as one separate entity. Although I can see it allowed for more scope and objectivity compared to a first person narrative, I found the concept a bit confusing and difficult to get into at first.


I would definitely recommend this book to anyone looking for a well written, engrossing story about family relationships and the trials we have to go through to find ourselves. 






Tuesday 15 November 2011

Oscar and Pacino


I wasn't planning on doing a post this evening but I have just listened to an absolutely fascinating radio programme on the Radio 4 website about Al Pacino and his love for Oscar Wilde's play Salome. Now being both a huge fan of Pacino and Mr Wilde this was a treat. The programme focuses on a recent drama documentary that Pacino has written, directed and starred in which mixes performance of the play Salome filmed over a week in New York with a footage of Al Pacino on a journey to discover the history behind the play and the truth about Oscar Wilde.

The film premiered at the Venice film festival back in September to, it would seem mixed reviews. Variety were not enamoured with it (http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117945964/) , the Hollywood Reporter were much more gushing in their praise (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/wilde-salome-venice-film-review-231024). Interestingly enough Salome herself is played by Jessica Chastain, who I was incredibly impressed with by her performance in The Help, so I am eager to see how she performs in a theatrical enviroment.

Despite his incredible success in movies, Al Pacino has always stayed true to his theatre origins and Wilde Salome appears to be very much in the same vein as 'Looking for Richard (1996) which if you have yet to see I throughly recommend. In that film, Al Pacino attempted to explore Richard III in a similar way to Salome, with performances of the play starring amongst others Winona Ryder and Kevin Spacey, in-depth discussions of the play and exploration of the historical background. If you have not seen this already I heartily recommend that you do even if you are not a die hard Shakespeare fan.



Despite searching high and low on the internet I cannot seem to find a nationwide release date for this film in the US or the UK, but it does not appear to be on dvd as of yet. There is a website (http://wildesalome.com/) and you can follow the production on twitter @WildeSalome. But for now here is the link to the radio programme and the trailer for the movie.

I would love to know if you are a fan of Pacino or Oscar Wilde and if so what your favourite quotes, favourite films or favourite plays are.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0174dzr

Sunday 13 November 2011

Review of Due Date


Year: 2010

Writers: Alan R Cohen, Alan Freedland, Adam Sztykiel and Todd Phillips.

Director: Todd Phillips

Plot: High strung father-to-be Peter Highman (Downey Jr) is forced to hitch a ride with aspiring actor Ethan Tremblay (Galifanakis) on a road trip in order to make it to the birth of his child on time.






The first thing to note about this movie is that it has a hell of a lot of writers. Perhaps that is why for the full 95 minute running time I kept thinking that this had to be the by-product of a creative writing session for schizophrenics. I also don't feel I am over exaggerating when I say that it is a long 95 minutes!

The truth is I wanted so much to love this movie! I am such a big fan of Robert Downey Jr and will tell anyone who wants to listen that the man is an acting genius of the highest degree, but even his comedy talents and strong jawline, could not make this movie anymore bearable. It was a film that really had strong potential in its two leads and the cameos from people like Juliette Lewis and Danny Mcbride, as well as the storyline. However, this is where it falls down. The problem is that we have seen this story done before and miles better in Planes, Trains and Automobiles and while watching Due Date, I kept thinking how good that movie was and wondering why I was watching this instead. I could have switched off at anytime and I would not have felt  worse off for having not seen the ending.

Zach Galifanakis and Robert Downey Jr seem to have thrown everything they could into this movie, but the problem lies in the fact that their characters just aren't very likeable. Galifanakis is an over the top caricature and seems to struggle to incite any empathy from the audience during emotional scenes, while Downey Jr is a vicious character who at one point spits in a dog's face and punches a child.

The film didn't seem to know what it wanted to be and maybe this is a result of having too many writers. One moment you are witnessing a masturbating Galifanakis and his dog and the next minute he is crying about his dead father while Downey Jr relates a story of how his father walked out on him as a child!

My best advice is stay well clear, because this movie sucks! I'll leave you with the trailer, because the best bits of the movie are in those 2 minutes and 9 seconds.

Have you seen it? What did you think?

Review of The Help

I have been a bit slack with my movie reviews of late, so today you get two for the price of one. The Help which I saw last weekend at the cinema and Due Date which was our Tuesday night movie courtesy of Lovefilm.

The Help - currently in cinemas.


Year: 2011

Writer: Kathryn Stockett (novel), Tate Taylor (screenplay.)

Director: Tate Taylor

Starring:  Emma Stone, Viola Davis, Bryce Dallas Howard, Octavia Spencer, Allison Janey

Plot:  Set in Mississippi during the 1960s, Skeeter is a southern society girl who returns from college determined to become a writer. But she turns her friends lives and a Mississippi town upside down when she decides to interview the black women who have spent their lives taking care of prominent southern families.



As I have already posted about the novel on this blog back in September I am not going to go over the plot in detail again or reiterate my love for the original source material. I want to focus more on how faithful the movie is to the novel and also how it plays to those coming to it with fresh eyes.

Having absolutely fallen in love with the novel while reading it for my book group and hearing so much Oscar buzz about this film since July, I came to it with the same apprehension as when I went to see One Day. While I was pleasantly surprised with that film, this movie exceeded my expectations! Top marks go to the casting directors Kerry Barden and Paul Schnee, who managed to find Skeeter's geekiness and empathy in rising star Emma Stone, Minny's sassiness in Octavia Spencer, Hilly Holbrook's prejudice and vengefulness in Bryce Dallas Howard and Aibleen's quiet strength in Viola Davis.

To be honest I could go on, as there is not single female performance in this movie that deserves to go unmentioned. It is great to see a mainstream movie with such a wide range of well developed female characters and I can imagine that every actress in Hollywood was fighting to be a part of this picture. Particular praise has to go to Jessica Chastain as dizzy blonde Celia Foote. She is the spitting image of how I imagined the character to be when reading the novel and her portrayal of Celia as being a naive girl with a big heart avoids the dumb white trash girl route that other actresses may have been tempted to take.

At no point during the movie did I feel anyone in the cinema getting restless and the balance of humour and pathos was just right, tears were shed in sadness and happiness!

If I had to come up with one negative point about the film, it would be that I feel it does shirk away slightly from some of the more controversial plot points or negative aspects of the characters. For example, in the boo  at no point do you feel any sympathy for Elizabeth Leefolt in her neglect of her daughter, while in the movie the character seems more conflicted in her actions. Readers of the novel may also be annoyed by the fact that the whole plot strand involving the reasons for the firing of Skeeter's childhood maid has been completely changed to something much more simplistic and less taboo.

To summarise this is a fantastically scripted and directed movie with some fantastic female performances and I am sure it is bound to come away with many Oscar nominations!

I would love to know if you have seen this film and if so what you thought of it? If you read the book, did it meet your expectations?

Read it Swap it

Being a self confessed book addict often means having a dwindling bank balance and although there is nothing more I love than spending hours in book stores perusing the shelves for exciting new treats to throw on the ever growing 'to read' pile, my aank Account says otherwise. As a big advocate of the importance of libraries in society for young and old, I would suggest that your first port of call for a free read should always be your local library. However, if your library is anything like mine (way too small for the city), then it is good for when you are looking for a spontaneous read, but not if you have a particular book in mind. 

This is where Read it Swap it comes in (http://www.readitswapit.co.uk). I first read about Read it Swap it in India Knight's fantastic 'The Thrift Book' where she comes up with lots of great ideas on 'how to live well and spend less,' definitely worth checking out! 


Read it Swap it is a UK based online book swapping website. It is free to join and once on there you have access to currently 371,272 books from all over the UK. The idea is that on your account, you build up a list of the books you have available to swap. This is really easy to do because you can just input the ISBN number above the barcode on the back of your book and the website immediately pulls up all the information about that book. You just need to describe the current condition of the book and it is important to be honest in this case, because once your swap is completed the recipient of your book will mark you on how honest you were about the description of the book.

You also have a wishlist where you can add all the books you are interested in reading and when another member adds that particular book Read it Swap it will send you an email notification so you can request a swap.

How does the swap work?

Once you have found a book you like the look of, you click to swap with that member. They will then receive an email notification and a link to your collection of books. They can refuse to swap with you if there is nothing they fancy reading , but if they find a book they like, they will confirm the swap and then the user will be able to see your postal address.  Once you have each received each others books, you will confirm on the site and rate your fellow swapper based on the speed of the swap and the condition of the book (was it as described?). 

Swapping tips

  • Always try and post your book within two days, if this is not going to be possible for some reason, email your fellow swapper and let them know there will be a delay.
  • I have found that most people tend to send books second class, so don't waste your money shipping first class because as long as the books come within a week you are unlikely to receive a bad rating.
  • The best way to send your book is to buy brown parcel wrapping paper and then wrap the book in three layers to ensure the book stays undamaged. The Post Office tend to consider this as a large letter so you will probably pay under £1.00 to post it. At first I was using large padded envelopes but it was getting too expensive.
I have completed 22 swaps up to now and am now officially a Read it Swap it addict!! Not only does it mean you can interact with fellow book lovers around the UK and maintain your reading addiction minus the expense, but there is also something old fashioned and exciting about receiving books in the post!!

Let me know if you are already on the site or plan to join and your experiences of it. Apologies if you are not UK based, but I would love to hear if you have something similar in your country.

Tuesday 8 November 2011

Is there a Dewey system for films?

Whenever I enter a person's house for the first time I carry out the same process every time. It involves a Sherlock Holmes style investigation of their book and film collection.  Now don't get me wrong this isn't some judgemental process where if their books or films are deemed not to reach a certain standard, then I summon the Grail Knight from Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade who enters, tells them they have chosen poorly and their face melts off!

No this is my attempt to get to know them better. You see I believe that almost everything you need to know about a person can be determined by their film or book collection and it is not just the content, it is also about the way they present it. That is why on Sunday while supervising the construction of our third and final Billy bookcase, I suffered a mild panic attack when I realised that maybe I was just too boring in my choice of organisational system.

One particularly traumatic evening I had the fantastic (or so I thought at the time) idea of organising my film collection according to lead actor/actress (depending on who was more famous) and director (but only if they were considered an auteur). I know, I have no idea why I thought it would work. Not surprisingly, it did not and I ended up chucking all my films back on the shelves in an extremely dull alphabetical order. Followed by DVDs and TV shows bringing up the rear.

Book wise I have attempted to be slightly more inventive. I have non-fiction in alphabetical order to start, followed by children's books, penguin special editions, travel books, history books, psychology and politics, film, TV, autobiographies and old antique looking books.

This all got me wondering what other possible, more interesting ways I could organise my stuff to shake things up a little and display a little more of my personality. So I made a little list:


  1. Colour coordination - A friend has all her DVDs colour coordinated. This works in a way, because the design of film posters lends itself to mainly pink or white for Rom coms and Chick Flicks, dark moody blues and blacks for thrillers, and light blues for drama. So there is some logic in this aesthetic choice, but what a nightmare to find anything.
  2. Date of publication or of release could work. It would make a very interesting way of charting the history of literature or movie making if you read or watched them in that order over the course of a year.
  3. Size- this only really works for books and is suitable for the extremely obsessive compulsive of the population.
  4. Genre - pretty self explanatory - although if you base the movie organisation on IMDB classifications then this could be a real headache. Mamma Mia for example comes under Comedy, Romance, Musical ahh!!!! I would need three copies.

Finally if you wanted to completely lose your sanity you could follow John Cusack's lead in High Fidelity and arrange everything based on autobiographical chronology. Now what was the first movie in my collection I   ever saw?? They would find me a week later quietly weeping on a pile of DVDs and muttering about whether 
I saw Goodfellas before Casino, still have no idea!



So plenty of ideas, but for my sanity and the safe keeping of the bookcases, I'll stick with what I have. Let me know how your film and book collections are organised. I would love to know if any of you have some really original ways of displaying them!

Photo sources. bookcases (colourlovers.com) DVDs (Gresswell.co.uk)

Saturday 5 November 2011

Nostalgia for childhood books and movies.

Last weekend marked another birthday and a further step on the way to the big 30! It was my belief that as the years went on I would become a wiser, more cultured individual. Taking countless trips to the opera, listening to classic FM, reading the great philosophers and watching French cinema.

However, to my surprise and initial horror I have found myself immersed in a deep nostalgia for childhood pleasures. Books and films that I discarded at the entrance to my teenage years with some disgust have now become my new obsession. It all started when I was called back to the parents' to clean out my room, which had pretty much been left as it was since I decided to become a Midlander in 2008. I came across all these children's books I had completely forgotten about such as Matilda by Roald Dahl, Horrible Histories, My Friend Walter by Michael Morpugo. Intrigued to see if I still found them as a good a read as back in the day, I took them back home and I was hooked!  

I started remembering all these books I loved as a child and wanted to read again, Secret Seven and Famous Five books by Enid Blyton, Nancy Drew Mysteries, Paddington Bear, Winnie the Pooh etc. Unfortunately it turned out that I had given away most of my books in my haste to become a moody, cynical teenager. So began my trawl through charity shops and second hand bookshops to try and compile the perfect childhood collection of books for pure escapism. This quest did not stop at books, I have also started collecting old childhood Disney films such as Beauty and the Beast and Winnie the Pooh and I forgot how fantastic they were!

So why has this nostalgia come about? Is it just another obsessive rung on the addictive personality ladder to madness or could it be something deeper than that? An article in The Telegraph in September this year asked this exact question of Dr Louise Joy, a Cambridge University academic. Her theory is that adults go back to reading childhood books because they are looking for a world where "self-consciousness is overthrown and relationships are uncomplicated." Put more simply, life is so stressful these days that sometimes we don't want to be reminded of the harsh reality of modern living and would prefer to regress to the fantasy world of talking bears and faraway trees provided by our favourite books from childhood.

It would seem more and more people are discovering that childhood books can be the key to stress relief and happiness. In her book 'The Happiness Project', Gretchen Rubin talks about how her initiative to start a children's literature book group for adults and her discovery that more people than she thought shared her passion for children's books. For Gretchen it was about 'returning to the world of stark good and evil, of talking animals and fulfilled prophecies.'

For me it was all about the nostalgia for a time when I could curl up on the sofa and disappear into a great book or film without nagging thoughts about work, money and other daily stresses circling around my head. So next time you are feeling stressed out with modern life, why not take a trip to the library and pick up a children's book, it maybe just what you were looking for.

Do any of you still read children's books or watch movies from your childhood? Why do you find yourself still drawn to them?


All pictures courtesy of Amazon.co.uk

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/8783522/Why-do-adults-like-childrens-books-Blame-modern-life.html

http://www.happiness-project.com/happiness_project/2007/07/are-you-looking.html

Thursday 3 November 2011

When obsession leads to a hidden treasure.

Ever since Gladiator first captivated me eleven years ago and introduced me to the wonderful world of cinema, I have obsessed with seven actors who all fall into the handsome, talented, intense performers category.



My addictive personality ensures that when I develop an interest in an actor, I have to know everything about them and their body of work. I will track down any magazine article, surf the web for interviews and attempt to watch and collect everything in their back catalogue of work.

Recently I realised that these back catalogue collections  have led me to discover some underrated film treasures that would normally have gone unnoticed had it not been for my obsession.

Often it is easy to get stuck in a rut of movie watching. Influenced by cinema listings, movie magazines, sequels, remakes and our favourite genres it is easy to stay within your comfort zone of film viewing. However, the discovery of an actor or actress can lead you to some fascinating little gems.

So over the next few weeks, I plan on delving into these actors' back catalogues and picking out for you, what I believe is their stand out performance and an underrated gem, which I feel you should check out.  My chosen actors are Joaquin Phoenix, Al Pacino, Johnny Depp, Robert Downey Jr, Gary Oldman, Jonathan Rhys Meyers and Tom Hardy.

In the meantime, I would love to know which actors/actresses are your favourites and which of their films you believe is a hidden gem.
All photos courtesy of IMDB.

Sunday 25 September 2011

Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy

Year: 2011

Writer: John Le Carre (novel.), Peter Straughan and Bridget O'Connor (screenplay.)

Director: Tomas Alfredson

Starring; Gary Oldman, Colin Firth, John Hurt, Tom Hardy, Toby Jones, Mark Strong, Benedict Cumberbatch, Ciaran Hinds, Kathy Burke

Plot: In the bleak days of the Cold War, espionage veteran George Smiley is forced from semi-retirement to uncover a Soviet agent within MI6's echelons.



Ever since I saw the trailer for Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy at the end of August before One Day, I have been super excited about this movie. Not just because I am a huge fan of the good old fashioned Cold War spy caper. But also because I have always been a massive advocate for the body of work of Gary Oldman. A supremely talented actor who has been considerably underused since the early noughties. Harry Potter and the Batman Franchise have revived his career and I am absolutely convinced that this movie is going to send him up to the top of every Hollywood casting agents wishlist once again.

I actually saw this movie about a week ago, but have been exceptionally lazy in getting this review up and I have to say that despite suffering from a corneal ulcer and sitting next to a fat bastard who spent the entire movie throwing popcorn into his face and slurping on his coca cola, I absolutely adored this movie. It was FANTASTIC!!!  This movie is a real slow burner with occasional bouts of action and brutal violence. There is nothing glamorous about the world of espionage according to John Le Carre. This is not Bourne or Bond.  Tomas Alfredson manages to capture the grim, lonely world of a spy during the Cold War where no one can be trusted and personal lives are destroyed by one's commitment to the Circus. The cinematography is dark and grainy and the tension slowly rises as you find yourself drawn deeper and deeper into the complex world of Smiley and his colleagues. Despite the source material being rather bulky and complex, the screenwriters have done an excellent job of condensing what was originally a 7 hour mini series in it's first screen adaptation into a 2 hour movie.

The ensemble cast is astounding. With so many talented individuals it is difficult to pick out the standout performances. But if I had to narrow it down to three I would say Gary Oldman, Tom Hardy and Mark Strong. Gary Oldman gives an extremely subtle performance as a weary, deep thinking Smiley. Despite not being overly showy he manages to command every scene he is in and allows the viewer to slowly peel away the layers of his character scene by scene. One of his best scenes is when he is describing his one and only face to face meeting with Soviet counterpart Karla to Benedict Cumberbatch's character. Instead of seeing the action in flashback we are treated to him reenacting his dialogue and see his admiration as well as repulsion for the Russian.

Mark Strong is as always excellent at playing the dark mysterious character who has been screwed over by those he once trusted and dumped into the civilian world as a teacher, living alone in a caravan on the school playing fields. Tom Hardy also excels as the handsome but naive foot soldier whose information from his Russian girlfriend assists Smiley in tracking down the mole but is eventually betrayed by those he felt he could trust.

I could talk about this movie for hours, but to summarise, this is an intelligent and thrilling old fashioned movie which demonstrates exactly why Britain has some of the most talented actors working in the film industry today. Please please go and see it!!

Sunday 18 September 2011

Laura's Handmade Life by Amanda Addison.

I actually finished this book back on 11th September but I have been a bit behind on the reviews recently so have only just got around to talk about it now.

Plot: Laura Lovegrove is leaving behind her seamless life in London. Architect husband Adi has been relocated to rural Norfolk, a far cry from ultra-urban Ealing. Though Laura knew village life would be different she didn't foresee a pokey cottage, nosey neighbours and even an ex turning up. Chris had been her big love at art college and seeing him again is utterly confusing. Is she really so different from the impulsive student who once trawled charity shops for vintage treasures. When a fire all but destroys Laura's collection of vintage clothes, she's heartbroken. But salvaging what she can, Laura make dos and mends- sewing purses, handbags, even dog leads. Soon she is inundated with orders. But Adi is becoming more distant. Is there something he is not telling her? Can Laura make a stitch in time and pull her family back together again?



This book was an impulse buy when I was purchasing The Help as it was buy one, get one half price in WH Smith. Always a dangerous temptation! This book initially got my attention because of my interest in all things crafty and the fact that I fancied a light hearted chick lit read after some of the more heavier tomes I had been tackling recently. There is a part of me that feels that this book is just an attempt to cash in on the craft, vintage, cake baking craze everyone seems to be going through currently. However the story is substantial enough that it keeps you interested and may even appeal to those not so into the crafty side of things.

I have to admit, I loved this book, despite the fact that the main character Laura might come across as a middle class whinger! On the face of it she seems to have everything but there are times when you do feel like you want to tell her to get over herself! The book however is saved by its humour, the quaint setting of the village, the wide variety of interesting personalities she comes across and the passion with which the writer talks about Laura's creativity.

Despite being a bit moody sometimes Laura does come across as a huge inspiration in the way she takes control of her life once the fire destroys her clothes collection and a big part of the cottage. She throws her self into her greatest passion, crafts, goes out of her way to attend workshops to learn new skills and meet new people and begins to slowly find her feet within the community and start a business.  While reading this book I was bursting with creativity and I kept wanting to run to the craft store, buy fabric and start manically sewing. Unfortunately my laziness kind of got in the way of that plan!

The only thing I found slightly annoying about the book at the beginning was the author's writing style, in that the action does have a tendency to jump all over the place. For example you will be in the middle of one scene where a conversation is taking place and then suddenly within the same paragraph, you are now reading about an event happening hours later in the day. There is no explanation for what happened in between and most of the time I ended up re-reading the paragraph just to make sure that I had not blacked out for a few seconds and missed the key plot points!

Apart from this I would really recommend this book and will definitely be re-reading this one again.

Monday 12 September 2011

The Other Guys

Year: 2010

Writer: Adam Mckay, Chris Henchy

Director: Adam Mckay

Starring: Will Ferrell, Mark Wahlberg, Eva Mendes, Michael Keaton, Samuel L Jackson, Steve Coogan and Dwayne Johnson.

Plot: Misfit detectives Gamble and Hoitz are sentenced to life behind a desk. They hate each other and the monotony of their meaningless jobs, as they are forced to live in the shadow of the two most badass cops on the force (Jackson and Johnson). But when those guys kick the bucket, opportunity knocks for Gamble and Hoitz. Stumbling onto what could be one of the biggest crimes in years, can The Other Guys step up their game to solve the case without killing each other and destroying NYC in the process.

This movie is just plain stupid with a couple of witty scenes thrown in there occasionally. I have to admit that I am not the biggest fan of Will Ferrell and I cannot stand Steve Coogan, but despite this I added this movie to my Lovefilm list because it looked funny in the trailer (rookie mistake!) and I was fascinated by the idea of Mark Wahlberg taking on a more comedic role after the serious award baiting fare of The Fighter and The Departed.  The fact is if it wasn't for Mark Wahlberg, I would have turned this movie off after the first 30 mins. He is brilliant in it!

The film starts off promising with two very entertaining cameos from Samuel L Jackson and Dwayne (the Rock) Johnson, as they rampage through NYC chasing criminals and destroying the city in the process. This starts off looking like it could be a great parody on the Lethal Weapon movies, but once Will Ferrell comes into the picture, all originiallity goes out the window. You can tell that Ferrell has been given free reign to improvise and most of the time it just doesn't work.

As previously mentioned the real stand out here is Mark Wahlberg. His comedic timing is impeccable and the scene where he is first introduced to Eva Mendes as Will Ferrell's smoking hot wife is one of the best scenes in it. Wahlberg struggles to comprehend quite how Ferrell married this woman and then very obviously hits  on her for the rest of the evening. The movie is also worth a watch just to see Michael Keaton back in a main role and he is great.

I have to say I was really disapointed with this film. I expected a lot from the trailer and obviously that is where all the best jokes are. They could have made this a very witty parody on Lethal Weapon and you can tell that they are aiming for this in parts, particularly with the way saxophone music plays over every male bonding moment. But this little in joke is about as far as they get with it.

If you love Will Ferrell you will probably find this hilarious, but if not, this is probably one to watch on a Friday night when you have had a few drinks and are not looking for anything too taxing. I give it 3.5 out of 5!

Sunday 11 September 2011

Going the Distance

Year: 2010

Writer: Geoff LaTulippe

Director: Nanette Burstein

Starring: Drew Barrymore, Justin Long, Jason Sudeikis and Christina Applegate

Plot: Erin and Garrett strike sparks for a summer fling in New York City but neither expects it to last once Erin heads home to San Francisco. But after six increasingly romantic weeks, neither is sure they want it to end. So despite the opposing coasts, nay saying friends and family and a few unexpected temptations, the couple might just have found something like love. And helped by a lot of texting, sexting and late night phone calls, they might actually go the distance.

Going the Distance was one of those movies that despite looking like your typical rom-com, I actually expected a lot more from because it had got rave reviews. However, I was actually slightly disappointed with it. The main issue I had was with the casting. Drew Barrymore seems just way too old for this kind of movie now. Despite only being 36 years old, the hard partying years have taken their toll and the fact that she has been around in the movie world since the age of 7, means that she seems a hell of a lot older. She is also an extremely talented actress and director and I felt that her talents were let down by the poor writing. Justin Long on the other hand seems a lot younger than his 31 years and despite being really likable characters on screen, the match just doesn't work. There is no chemistry there which is often the case with real life couples. Remember Nicole Kidman and Tom Cruise in Eyes Wide Shut! ugh!

Justin Long's friends were played by Charlie Day and Jason Sudeikis (of Saturday Night Live fame.) Jason Sudeikis was great as the older wiser friend with all the best advice, but Charlie Day played the bumbling stoner type which I feel is kinda outdated. He only had a couple of good lines revolving around the fact that he tended to listen in to Drew and Justin while in Justin's bedroom and then play appropriate movie sex scene music accordingly. Apart from that he mainly annoyed the hell out of me.

The real star of this movie has to be Christina Applegate, as Drew's older slightly OCD sister, she consistently had all the best lines and proved herself yet again to be a master of physical and verbal comedy. Any scene that she was in was laugh out loud hilarious. It was mainly for her that I kept watching and the fact that having been in a long distance relationship myself in the past, a lot of the scenarios were very familiar and often quite touching.

If you look at other reviews for this movie on Imdb, it seems that most people seemed to love it and I am in the minority. Maybe I expected too much of it and the fact that I don't really get the appeal of Justin Long probably did not help. But I would say that if you are looking for a amusing and touching romantic comedy that does exactly what it says on the tin and you are not expecting to be falling off your chair with laughter, or blown away by the dialogue and plot, then you could do worse than this.

If you have seen it let me know what you think. Am I the only one unimpressed by this movie?

Wednesday 7 September 2011

Charlie Wilson's War

Year: 2007

Writer: Aaron Sorkin

Director: Mike Nichols

Starring: Tom Hanks, Julia Roberts, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Amy Adams.

Plot: Charlie Wilson's War is the true story of how a playboy congressman, a renegade CIA agent and a beautiful Houston socialite joined forces to lead the largest and most successful covert operation in history.Their efforts contributed to the fall of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, with consequences that reverberate throughout the world today.






Charlie Wilson's War  was  one of the movies that I originally saw at the cinema when it first came out, loved it and then promptly forgot about it. I rediscovered it a few months ago in the glory that is the HMV sale, where some real gems are often to be found. I watched it on Saturday night and remembered just how well written and acted this movie was. 


Written by Aaron Sorkin (the guy behind The Social Network) and directed by Mike Nichols (of Closer fame),This film tells the now well known story of how the US trained and armed resistance fighters in Afghanistan and aided them in defeating the Russians and bringing about the fall of communism in the East. But it focuses on the less well known story of who was actually behind this, an alcoholic congressman called Charlie Wilson. 


This film is a not only a fascinating glimpse behind the curtain of US interference but it is also incredibly funny. Tom Hanks is as always brilliant and as he started in comedy in the 80s, it is nice to see him going back to his roots. Julie Roberts is enchanting, but it is Philip Seymour Hoffman who steals the movie by a mile. His turn as CIA renegade Gus Avrakotos who has no respect for anyone and has serious anger issues is genius! At points with him and Tom Hanks the movie almost veers in to screwball territory.  Check out one of his best scenes below.




Watching the events of this movie now and knowing what we do about September 11th and the war on terror, this movie seems strangely poignant. In particularly when Charlie Wilson tries to convince the US government that following the fall of the Soviet Union it is important that they invest in the education of the young Afghans to avoid ignorance and resentment and the government refuse. It is a timely reminder of what happens when a country interferes in the affairs of another, but then does not clean up their mess before they leave.


I give this movie 4 stars, so worth checking it out!!


"These things happened, they were glorious and they changed the world and then we fucked up the endgame." - Charlie Wilson





Tuesday 6 September 2011

The Help by Kathryn Stockett

Crikey it has been a busy two weeks of reading and film watching and I have three reviews to tell you all about so I better crack on!!

The Help by Kathryn Stockett.

Enter a vanished world: Jackson, Mississippi, 1962. Where black maids raise white children, but aren't trusted not to steal the silver.

There's Aibileen raising her seventeenth white child and nursing the hurt caused by her own son's tragic death; Minny whose cooking is nearly as sassy as her tongue; and white Miss Skeeter, home from college, who wants to know why her beloved maid has disappeared.

No one would believe they would be friends; fewer still would tolerate it. But as each woman finds the courage to cross boundaries, they come to depend and rely upon one another. Each is in search of a truth. And together they have an extraordinary story to tell.



This book was read as part of my monthly book group. There are four of us and each month one person takes a turn to select five books, sometimes with an underlying theme, sometimes books just on the shelf and then the rest of the group select their top 3. The one with the most votes wins and it is as simple as that. We then meet up about 4 weeks later to talk about the book.

I have to admit that this was not my first choice for this month's book group. I had heard rave reviews about it  but was not sure it was really something I would be interested in and too much hype often tends to put me off books. However, once I got into this book I was entranced! One Sunday afternoon I spent 3 hours straight absorbed in the unfamiliar but utterly engrossing portrayal of life in a Southern town in 60's America.

The story is told by the three main characters Aibileen, Minny and Skeeter and the book takes you through the turn of events in Jackson, Mississippi through each of their eyes. As the story develops you feel as if you know these people intimately, like they were your closest friends. I could see myself sat at Aibileen's kitchen table while she wrote her prayers, hiding in the larder closet with Miss Skeeter as she conducted telephone conversations in secret away from the nosy attentions of her ever critical mother and cringing as Minny humiliates her former bosses daughter in the most disgusting but hilarious way!

This book taught me so much that I didn't know about the ways in which white owners treated their black maids and the utter ignorance they had about black people. The fact they thought they could catch diseases from them just by using the same toliets or eating at the same table was astounding. And despite the book focusing mainly on the main characters there are references to the important historical events of the civil rights struggle, although suprisling despite being set around 1963 there is only a very brief mention of the death of JFK. More is devoted to the murder of black civil rights activist Medgar Evans, emphasising that this book is more about the often forgotten voices of the everyday black people fighting an ongoing struggle.

I thought Kathryn Stockett had done an excellent job in portraying the friendships between people in times of segregation and I found her brief article at the back of the book about her own maid Demetrie rather affecting. One must note that a lawsuit was brought against Kathryn by Aibilene Cooper, a housekeeper for the household of Kathryn's brother, who claimed that Kathryn had used her image, likeness and background without permission. This case was thrown out by a judge on 16th August. Make of it what you will.

Have you read this book or are you reading it? What did you think of it? I would love to hear your thoughts, don't be shy!

Wednesday 24 August 2011

One Day

Well I have just got back from a girlie night at the cinema to see the eagarly awaited One Day. I had never heard of this best selling novel from David Nicholls first published back in 2009, when Miss G lent it to me for my holiday read. Sometimes the books you know nothing about are the ones that blow you away the most and I advise you to beg, borrow or steal a copy of this book, preferably before you see the movie because you will not be able to put it down. So as you can imagine we were extremely desperate to see the movie and had already booked our seats about two weeks ago. So what did I think? Read on..

Year: 2011
Writer: David Nicholls (screenplay and book)
Director: Lone Scherfig
Starring: Anne Hathaway, Jim Sturgess, Patricia Clarkson, Romola Garai, Ken Stott and Rafe Spall.

Plot: St Swithin's Day 1988. Bookish Emma and raffish Dexter spend the night together on their last day at Edinburgh University. We subsequently pick up their friendship on various July 15s over the next 20 odd years, charting how their lives diverge and come together as they grow older.

It is often very difficult when you really love a book and fall in love with the characters to be able to enjoy the movie version. The reason for this being that while reading the book you have imagined the characters and the setting and played out your own movie directed inside your head. Another persons interpretation rarely lives up to your expectations.

However, I have to say, in this case I was pleasantly surprised. One Day is so much better than the reviews lead you to believe. Danish Director Lone Scherfig, who was also responsible for the excellent An Education, has done a fantastic job of conveying the ups and downs of Dexter and Emma's relationship and she has stayed extremely faithful to the book's concept of catching up with the friends on the same day every year.

The casting is also extremely well thought out, with Jim Sturgess playing the charming cad Dexter to perfection, so much so that you fall in love with him straight away, so that even when he is doing the most despicable things you still manage to relate to Emma's continued affection for him. Anne Hathaway as always is on good form, although her Yorkshire/American/Bridget Jones accent may get on your nerves after a while as it is clear the poor girl struggled somewhat. Which makes me wonder why they just didn't hire a Brit!
But the real stand out performances are Rafe Spall, who absolutely nails the role of Emma's geeky comedian boyfriend Ian to cringe inducing perfection and the always fabulous Patricia Clarkson, who plays Dexter's mother with such grace and poise and who I have been just a little bit in love with since seeing her in Easy A and The Station Agent.

The only negative point I would bring up is that if you have not read the book, the director's faithfulness to the original story may cause you to become a bit lost. In order to fit in all 15 years worth of days, they have had to cut out a lot of back story, so that during some jumps I found myself having to remember what had happened in the book to make sense of the context of the current scene. For this reason the first 40 mins feels a bit rushed, but once Lone Scherfig slows things down a bit you real start to care about these two characters.

I would definitely recommend this! 4 out of 5 stars!

Check out the trailer and if you go let me know what you think.


The trailers beforehand always throw up some exciting upcoming movies and this time was no exception. I am   very excited by the prospect of Gary Oldman, Tom Hardy, Colin Firth and John Hurt to name a few in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy out on 16th September.


Tuesday 23 August 2011

The Disappearance of Alice Creed

Last night I finally got around to watching The Disappearance of Alice Creed, which had been sat on my blu-ray player for weeks as often happens with my Lovefilm picks. But it was well worth the wait!

Year: 2009
Writer and Director: J Blakeson
Starring: Gemma Arterton, Eddie Marsan and Martin Compston

Plot: Two men fortify a nondescript British apartment so it can serve as a prison, and then kidnap a woman and tie her to the bed. Before there is even time to react we are plunged into a very nasty situation, but not a simple one.





Alice Creed is a small budget British movie with a cast of only three and a limited setting, however this allows writer/director J Blakeson to focus on building up tension and fleshing out characters who at first seem rather one dimensional but gather more depth as time passes on.

The opening 15 mins are dialogue free as we see the two kidnappers Vic and Danny converting the flat into a prison including sound proofing rooms and fortifying doors. This ratchets up the tension as we are given a glimpse into the preparation that goes into the crime and end up feeling like accomplices. We are not given any information about Alice Creed's outside life, the first we see of her is when she is being bundled into the back of a van. From then on the camera is trapped in the flat with Alice and the last third of the movie when the action transfers to the outside world is almost a relief.

The three cast members do a stellar job in keeping the audience's attention. By having no other cast members except for this trio, J Blakeson ensures that we feel cut off from the outside world. Relying on only Vic's descriptions of his telephone calls to Alice's father, to give us some idea of what may be happening on the outside.

Eddie Marsan as Vic appears at first to be your standard British movie criminal, but a plot twist in the middle of the movie allows us to see a more complex, fragile character. Martin Compston as Danny keeps us guessing as to his motives, but it is Gemma Marston as Alice Creed who really carries this movie. Her performance is riveting, powerful and at times emotionally draining particularly in the first 30 mins when she is unsure what the kidnappers plan to do to her.

I would not recommend this movie for those of a fragile disposition, as although there is not a lot of violence, it is psychologically uncomfortable at times, however this was a movie that kept me on the edge of my seat. I spent the majority of the movie curled up in a ball against the couch leaning forward and to me that is the mark of a good thriller. Tense and well acted, this is definitely one to put on your Lovefilm list.

Check out the trailer below and let me know if you have seen it what you thought of it.


If you like this you may like:


Ransom (1996) - 


Saturday 20 August 2011

Previews of up and coming attractions!

If you haven't yet discovered the wonder of iTunes Movie Trailers, I suggest you do now! It is quite possible to wile away the hours perusing hundreds of old and new trailers in often stunning HD. While surfing the website this morning I came across a couple of future movies that grabbed my attention and thought I would share them with you.

FRIGHT NIGHT
released 2nd September
Starring Colin Farrell and David Tennant


Now this is a guilty pleasure if ever I saw one. Due for release in the UK on the 2nd September, Fright Night is a remake of the 1985 movie of the same name. Now if you are anything like me you worship at the altar of the 80s movie and often modern remakes fail to capture that sense of fun that movies like Top Gun had. However having not seen the original and going on the trailer below, this new interpretation starring Colin Farrell and our very own David Tennant looks like a fab Friday night popcorn flick!

Teenager Charley Brewster guesses that his new neighbour Jerry Dandridge is a vampire responsible for a string of recent deaths. When no one believes him, he enlists Peter Vincent, a self proclaimed vampire killer and Las Vegas magician, to help him take down Jerry.

Check out the trailer and let me know what ya think!


COWBOYS AND ALIENS
out now
Starring Harrison Ford and Daniel Craig


This has a host of big names attached which stirs strong hopes in me that this has got to be fab. Directed by Jon Favreau (Iron Man), produced by Ron Howard and Brian Grazer and with Steven Spielberg as Executive Producer, this has some real creative talent on board. But when you see that it stars Harrison Ford and Daniel Craig, I think it is safe to say the plot does not need explaining. All you need to know is Indiana Jones and James Bond fight aliens in the Wild West. I'm there!!


THE HELP
released on 28th October.
Starring Emma Stone,Bryce Dallas Howard and Allison Janey


I am currently in the middle of reading the original novel for my book group and am therefore too scared myself to watch the trailer in case it gives away too much of the plot! However I am so excited about catching the movie when it comes out and there is some real Oscar buzz for this one as well.

The Help is based in Jackson, Mississippi in 1962. Where black maids raise white children but are not trusted not to steal the silver. The story focuses on Aibleen who is still mourning the loss of her 17 year old son, Minny whose cooking is almost as sassy as her tongue; and white Miss Skeeter, home from college who wants to know why her beloved maid has disapeared.


THE WOMAN IN BLACK
released 10th February 2012
Starring Daniel Radcliffe


Not released until February next year but this film starring Daniel Radcliffe marks his first main headlining movie post Harry Potter. The original novel by Susan Hill was hailed almost immediately as a classic in the Victorian Gothic Horror genre and has since then become a successful West End play. This version has been adapted for the screen by Jonathan Ross' wife Jane Goldman who was also responsible for Kick Ass and Stardust.

A young lawyer travels to a remote village to organize a recently deceased client's papers, where he discovers the ghost of a scorned woman set on vengenace.

If the trailer sends shivers down your spine this could be the movie for you. It looks like it has managed to achieve the Gothic horror atmosphere without going completely overboard on the horror front in the way The Picture of Dorian Gray did. This is more about what you don't see.


Can't wait to hear what you all think of my picks!